From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jay Berkenbilt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnus-summary-save-in-rmail Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:31:55 -0400 Message-ID: <20090623193149.2181821289.qww314159@motoko.argon.local> References: <20090623165455.1680008466.qww314159@motoko.argon.local> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1245799938 12644 80.91.229.12 (23 Jun 2009 23:32:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 24 01:32:11 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MJFTH-0005Fr-6o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:32:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55070 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJFTG-0002sM-E9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:32:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJFTA-0002oT-Rd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:32:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJFT6-0002e0-AX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:32:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41485 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJFT5-0002dn-VU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:32:00 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.mail.tigertech.net ([64.62.209.72]:46282) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MJFT4-0003tH-7Q; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:31:58 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE01430685; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:31:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hermes.tigertech.net Original-Received: from motoko.argon.local (unknown [72.165.80.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hermes.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FA7430683; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:31:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:15:22 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:111669 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: >> Does this make the gnus-summary-save-in-rmail function misnamed >> since it seems to still write in BABYL format? > > I don't think so. It writes "the format used by rmail" rather than > "babyl format". From the doc of gnus-output-to-rmail, which > gnus-summary-save-in-rmail calls: > > In Emacs 22 this writes Babyl format; in Emacs 23 it writes mbox > unless FILENAME exists and is Babyl format. I missed this. Thanks. I had only tried appending to an existing file. --Jay