From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taylor Venable Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Font Problem with 23.0.92.1 - wrong font used Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:39:06 -0400 Message-ID: <20090415023906.GI6280@metasyntax.net> References: <20090408050247.GD5160@metasyntax.net> <20090410213806.GH5160@metasyntax.net> <20090413173850.GA30710@metasyntax.net> <20090414031419.GF6280@metasyntax.net> <20090414115004.GH6280@metasyntax.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1239763282 14228 80.91.229.12 (15 Apr 2009 02:41:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 15 04:42:38 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ltv59-0001hg-Ru for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:42:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56872 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ltv3l-0001nA-2u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ltv3h-0001n5-K3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:41:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ltv3g-0001mt-4w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:41:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49246 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ltv3g-0001mq-1c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:41:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.194]:52496) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ltv3f-0000Pr-NZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from metasyntax.net (pool-71-127-85-87.aubnin.fios.verizon.net [71.127.85.87]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKpCa-1Ltv3P0K4O-000d5L; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:40:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090414115004.GH6280@metasyntax.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18RSqlcTlkjh+81iXw+IGEvyb1e2WZq2EOFLwi REij/shXCFuQOYQe/PTEmqX4sSJPJdbUqIWA+DnrMTdFhQKIs2 6SxFPxs+IpG0MPC0aH8XQ== X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110293 Archived-At: On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 07:50:05AM -0400, Taylor Venable wrote: > This is on OpenBSD so maybe there's something weird in how X is setup; > I'll find a Linux box today to test on and see if there's any similar > or different behaviour there. And wouldn't you know, it works just fine with the Japanese font in place on my Ubuntu 8.10 system at work. The behaviour on Ubuntu with the ja font is the same as on OpenBSD *without* the ja font, which is the "right" behaviour. -- Taylor Christopher Venable http://real.metasyntax.net:2357/