From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Don Armstrong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail?? Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:34:19 -0800 Message-ID: <20090201203419.GF4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> References: <20090131104403.GQ4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20090131211929.GT4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20090131222401.GU4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> <49853F90.7070608@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233520467 18827 80.91.229.12 (1 Feb 2009 20:34:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:34:27 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 01 21:35:40 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LTj2Z-0004rO-Df for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:35:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59813 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTj1G-0006ni-Hd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:34:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTj1C-0006nN-5a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:34:14 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTj1A-0006n7-9S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:34:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=32874 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTj1A-0006n4-4S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:34:12 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:37771) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LTj19-0004yE-La for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:34:11 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n11KY8ZV014877 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:34:08 -0800 Original-Received: (from remotemail@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n11KY8nl014876 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:34:08 -0800 Original-Received: (nullmailer pid 23651 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:34:19 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49853F90.7070608@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108529 Archived-At: On Sun, 01 Feb 2009, Jason Rumney wrote: > For other sub-packages that come under the umbrella of the emacs > developers, we have assigned bugs to "emacs,PACKAGE", so that the > sub-package can be used as a filter in the web interface, but the > emacs maintainers continue to be kept in the loop. I think usertags and completely reassigning the bug to the other package will serve you all better in the end, but that's your choice. > People don't file bugs against those packages, since the only > address for filing bugs is for emacs. But they might get reassigned > later. People can, actually. And file in this case also means reassign; you get warned if you assign a bug to a package which does not exist. Don Armstrong -- More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly. -- Woody Allen http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu