From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:06:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <200901300906.n0U96p6m022469@rodan.ics.uci.edu> References: <87y6xpvyz6.fsf@xemacs.org> <87zli4jcc4.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> <87vdsrjcco.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> <87fxjgb4ud.fsf_-_@red-bean.com> <87eiyy3lag.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87bpu1451m.fsf@red-bean.com> <874ozs34c6.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87k58nyih3.fsf@red-bean.com> <87ocxxrjnh.fsf@canonical.com> <874ozp4ld3.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87ocxrgm4g.fsf@canonical.com> <87ocxqqx1y.fsf@CPU107.opentrends.net> <874ozi7z5u.fsf@red-bean.com> <200901291850.n0TIoa10015665@rodan.ics.uci.edu> <87d4e57tom.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233306533 23552 80.91.229.12 (30 Jan 2009 09:08:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 30 10:10:06 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LSpNx-0005eS-0e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:10:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32976 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LSpMe-00068O-Os for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:08:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LSpLA-0005RJ-DX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:07:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LSpL9-0005QK-Ba for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:07:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43816 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LSpL9-0005QB-0e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:07:07 -0500 Original-Received: from sallyv2.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.120]:58337) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LSpL8-0000yi-Fe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:07:06 -0500 Original-Received: from rodan.ics.uci.edu (rodan.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.9]) by sallyv2.ics.uci.edu (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n0U96qLW011350; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:06:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: (from dann@localhost) by rodan.ics.uci.edu (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id n0U96p6m022469; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:06:51 -0800 (PST) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87d4e57tom.fsf@red-bean.com> (Karl Fogel's message of "Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:18:01 -0500") Original-Lines: 28 X-ICS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ICS-MailScanner-ID: n0U96qLW011350 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.363, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, TW_BZ 0.08) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@rodan.ics.uci.edu X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108392 Archived-At: Karl Fogel writes: > Dan Nicolaescu writes: > > Karl Fogel writes: > > > Done: http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs-en/EmacsBzrSwitchover > > > > Does the current bzr put the version info in the "bzr diff" headers? > > Does "bzr log SUBDIR" work now? > > No, neither of those bugs is fixed yet -- respectively: > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/130588 > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/97715 > > They're on the bzr developers' radar screen, and I think they will get > fixed eventually (I may work on #130588 myself, as soon as I'm done with > #306394, but #97715 is likely to be beyond my skills as a bzr dev for > some time). Ian Clatworthy has just finished some log improvements > (https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/2009q1/052131.html) in > performance, and I will be asking him about the 'log SUBDIR' case again. > > However, I thought we decided these didn't have to block the switchover? No idea, but who said anything about blocking? But it's a bit worrying that even bugs that should be very easy to fix (like the diff bug) don't get addressed...