From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "S.P.Zeidler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: m68k--netbsdelf still in use Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:42:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20090119184227.GA19353@serpens.de> References: <20090114193612.GM29020@serpens.de> <87wscvxo8x.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <200901170657.n0H6v44f028578@mothra.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1232397280 15019 80.91.229.12 (19 Jan 2009 20:34:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:34:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 19 21:35:52 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LP0qc-0006yV-DP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:35:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46058 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LP0pL-0006vg-15 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:34:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LOz5S-00084o-Kz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:43:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LOz5P-00083l-NQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:43:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51486 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LOz5O-00083a-31 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:42:58 -0500 Original-Received: from serpens.de ([195.22.142.107]:53867) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LOz5N-00020j-D5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:42:57 -0500 Original-Received: from serpens.de (spz@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serpens.de (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n0JIgWYc029078 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:42:37 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (from spz@localhost) by serpens.de (8.13.8/8.12.11) id n0JIgS3Q024482; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:42:29 +0100 (MET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200901170657.n0H6v44f028578@mothra.ics.uci.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: NetBSD 3.0 (DF) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:34:12 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107997 Archived-At: Hi, Thus wrote Dan Nicolaescu (dann@ics.uci.edu): > Chong Yidong writes: > > > > serpens.de is an Amiga 3000 with an M68060 and 128M RAM. > > > It runs NetBSD 4.0 at present. > > > > Is this the machine identified by the following line from the Emacs 22 > > configure file? > > > > case "${canonical}" in > > alpha*-*-netbsd*) machine=alpha ;; > > i[3456]86-*-netbsd*) machine=intel386 ;; > > m68k-*-netbsd*) > > # This is somewhat bogus. > > machine=hp9000s300 ;; Up to now, yes. > > If so, the file src/m/hp9000s300.h has been removed from CVS, but it may > > be feasible to restore it. (Dan, could you check?) > > I'd say it would be better to first try to see if CVS HEAD works with machine=m68k > on that platform. --- snip --- Index: configure =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/emacs/emacs/configure,v retrieving revision 1.305 diff -u -r1.305 configure --- configure 9 Dec 2008 20:36:23 -0000 1.305 +++ configure 19 Jan 2009 18:16:02 -0000 @@ -2459,6 +2459,7 @@ arm-*-netbsd*) machine=arm ;; x86_64-*-netbsd*) machine=amdx86-64 ;; hppa-*-netbsd*) machine=hp800 ;; + m68k-*-netbsd*) machine=m68k ;; esac ;; --- snip --- will build, and edit files just fine. Is there a test suite to probe the resulting binary more closely? regards, spz -- spz@serpens.de (S.P.Zeidler)