From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?6ams5peL77yIU3VwZXJNTVjvvIk=?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving to bzr? Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:21:41 +0800 Organization: SuperMMX.org Message-ID: <20090106142141.18959daf.SuperMMX@gmail.com> References: <871vviif6s.fsf@xemacs.org> <87wsd9tqt6.fsf@notengoamigos.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231222932 2079 80.91.229.12 (6 Jan 2009 06:22:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 06:22:12 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 06 07:23:22 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LK5LS-0002G1-Eh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:23:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44909 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LK5KB-0003IQ-VE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:22:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LK5K3-0003IK-BS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:21:51 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LK5K1-0003I8-Pk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:21:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44688 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LK5K1-0003I5-GA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:21:49 -0500 Original-Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.184]:38338) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LK5K0-0004IR-UE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:21:49 -0500 Original-Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id u5so6332752tia.10 for ; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:21:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:to:subject:message-id :in-reply-to:references:organization:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; bh=6Umqnsq82s8FSErf1MvYD431+IneAkgGwMbV4IgaXg4=; b=LY0240OFjn/tWp4/iGtjq1Id+FeCo7gRa9PMPpcbjJP2y39CGMz19PXaSbxykEq56V 2YU4LySCxAJfMDuC8tpRZOb6SlukIaKNkjtJw2/u1l6DRNa/c6xutH9POICZDe/2YZJg QoqutnFZjr4DdpznfFpG+lTSZtjqrGVGuRrZI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=aFuY8YJMAGVioHcit5aJV3/0UB/xrxq+ZmW3bc2Z4cuCgXJRDHs42uvDa8O1IGU4fV wy0EJPkuejmJ0ntBklsRt7Nj5k3syusce1npJw4SyyYwVk9WeiMo8313SDYTPIEMG35M 0zpJXxlD2jyptq+TTzfDRLRShB1ScyeZOLP0Y= Original-Received: by 10.110.43.16 with SMTP id q16mr4692226tiq.7.1231222906954; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:21:46 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from xuama-wxp02.cisco.com ([64.104.161.174]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u8sm254621tia.8.2009.01.05.22.21.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:21:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107631 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, dhruva : On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:37:08 +0530 dhruva wrote: > I tried with: > bzr pull http://bzr.notengoamigos.org/emacs-ce/trunk/ --remember > > And it works. It appears faster but am still using the 'http' and not > 'bzr'. In git, that makes a big difference and it is suggested to use > 'git' protocol. Is there something similar in bzr? > I feel 'bzr' expects the server to be running on port 4155. When I try > 'telnet bzr.notengoamigos.org 4155', it fails to connect and hence I > feel the bzr server is down. > > -dhruva I regularly pull updates from the same host with http about once a week, and from my experience the speed is almost consistent, the time is about 1m - 1m30s. Never tried bzr:// before. - -- A. Because it makes the logic of the discussion difficult to follow. Q. Why shoudn't I top post? A. No. Q Should I top post? A: Because it destroys the flow of the conversation Q: Why is it bad? A: No, it's bad. Q: Should I top post in replies to mailing lists? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkli+HYACgkQYjhzyV/TMxs2UACfQYUppevLidmgWRqVAmV+cL5z E/oAniax6Z3E0eF/wRw79ysK72RjQMfC =SW2M -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----