From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christian Faulhammer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving to bzr? Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:35:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20090104143522.5449e216@terra.solaris> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/s2Cy/5iqZRboYva8shcQWCX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231087328 4579 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2009 16:42:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:42:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: dhruva Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 04 17:43:16 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJW4E-0002dk-6i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:43:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43783 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJW2y-00019Y-VV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:41:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJT99-0007fN-Db for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJT96-0007eJ-RT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:36:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50810 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJT96-0007eC-Lp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:36:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.181]:31791) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJT96-0005EW-67 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:36:00 -0500 X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 X-RZG-AUTH: :K2kKYU+nW/MMMlTokcN5Yot1/Bj/FTl+WviP6RIJci0HRMpbh/x+X6ShOQjVOj0+68zULwoFMW8= Original-Received: from terra.solaris (p54AE5384.dip.t-dialin.net [84.174.83.132]) by post.strato.de (mrclete mo60) (RZmta 18.7) with ESMTP id x02e7cl04CEqyU ; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:35:54 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:41:49 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107572 Archived-At: --Sig_/s2Cy/5iqZRboYva8shcQWCX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, dhruva : > I am updating bzr from their development branch and hence have the > latest and greatest. When I run a 'bzr pull' on Emacs repo daily, it > is running for >15 mins versus less than 3 mins for git. This is a > serious usability issue. If more constructive feedback is required, I > could profile it send the output over time and see if things are > improving or status quo. I do share your current observations, though I sync regularly and I always had a ration of 1:2 (Git 1.6.0.4 to Bzr 1.10) up to now. So I assume this is not a systematic issue but depending on the delivering machine. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/s2Cy/5iqZRboYva8shcQWCX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAklguxoACgkQNQqtfCuFnePAlwCeK5Bx+iAc2i7feJBsz3w7S6kS hG8AnApxexaWnwiFT5HY6G7Y0lbmFv+f =ZP65 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/s2Cy/5iqZRboYva8shcQWCX--