From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs.app dev]: ghost cursor problem is still there Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:23:15 -0700 Message-ID: <200808232323.m7NNNF10027494@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> References: <5f089c510807191428n349bdf55gebdff2e0ca668db7@mail.gmail.com> <7C93A2A7-54FD-43A9-BA1B-0B8502FFA5C6@gmail.com> <1AFEFF71-2AEA-4282-915E-B03050E98592@gmail.com> <8ED46157-6210-4767-A5AE-0DDE4C9DB1B3@gmail.com> <90AB958C-083A-4DA6-86B6-C63DB82776CE@gmail.com> <200808231730.m7NHUdUv018072@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200808232113.m7NLDf9Z028460@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1219533953 24060 80.91.229.12 (23 Aug 2008 23:25:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: David Reitter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 24 01:26:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KX2VI-0006KD-Jh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Aug 2008 01:26:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46110 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KX2UK-0000du-Oo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:25:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KX2UF-0000dU-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:25:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KX2UF-0000cs-3X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:25:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51207 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KX2UE-0000ck-I2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:25:38 -0400 Original-Received: from sallyv1.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.109]:62150) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KX2UE-0004AP-Cx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:25:38 -0400 X-ICS-MailScanner-Watermark: 1220138596.24721@MOm6THem+xI6HH0xupjYkA Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by sallyv1.ics.uci.edu (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m7NNNF10027494; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:23:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (David Reitter's message of "Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:33:34 -0400") Original-Lines: 17 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102900 Archived-At: David Reitter writes: > On 23 Aug 2008, at 17:13, Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > > > AFAIK they should be identical, except for formatting, no need to > > indent > > the CVS logs with a TAB. > > Right, and the CVS comment for the ChangeLog is then supposed to > contain a third copy of the same info - is that correct? AFAIK there's no strong rule about that one. My personal prefererence to check in both the ChangeLog and the change itself at the same time, so implicitly they will both have the same log entry, but many people don't do it that way. I'd guess the explanation is that nobody wants to look at the log for ChangeLog.