From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs.app dev]: ghost cursor problem is still there Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:13:41 -0700 Message-ID: <200808232113.m7NLDf9Z028460@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> References: <5f089c510807191428n349bdf55gebdff2e0ca668db7@mail.gmail.com> <7C93A2A7-54FD-43A9-BA1B-0B8502FFA5C6@gmail.com> <1AFEFF71-2AEA-4282-915E-B03050E98592@gmail.com> <8ED46157-6210-4767-A5AE-0DDE4C9DB1B3@gmail.com> <90AB958C-083A-4DA6-86B6-C63DB82776CE@gmail.com> <200808231730.m7NHUdUv018072@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1219526211 4903 80.91.229.12 (23 Aug 2008 21:16:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:16:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Adrian Robert , Emacs-Devel devel To: David Reitter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 23 23:17:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KX0UR-0007dm-Mx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:17:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46463 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KX0TT-0003zq-JY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:16:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KX0TP-0003zj-9I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:16:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KX0TN-0003zX-Vg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:16:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56714 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KX0TN-0003zU-PM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:16:37 -0400 Original-Received: from sallyv1.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.109]:49406) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KX0TN-0006s9-8z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:16:37 -0400 X-ICS-MailScanner-Watermark: 1220130822.44434@RZG4oyZXFvi65GSh5mx31A Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by sallyv1.ics.uci.edu (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m7NLDf9Z028460; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:13:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (David Reitter's message of "Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:47:11 -0400") Original-Lines: 41 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102898 Archived-At: ["emacs.app dev list" trimmed from the CC list, please do not CC closed list to posts to public mailing lists]. David Reitter writes: > On 23 Aug 2008, at 13:30, Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > >> > >> + drawGlyph = 1; // just draw the Glyph > >> [FRAME_BACKGROUND_COLOR (f) set]; > >> ! > >> ! NSDisableScreenUpdates (); > > > > > > Unfortunately this breaks GNUStep: > > Not a problem; I have checked in a fix. Thanks. > Can you let us know how well this works on GNUStep? > Is there a lot of flicker when moving the cursor or in blink-cursor- > mode? Unfortunately, the only machine I have access to that runs GNUStep is behind a slow link, so it won't be relevant... > > Also please make sure that your log entries are properly formatted: > > > > Like ChangeLog, it should contain the changed function name, > > OK, I can do that. I modeled my earlier comments after others in that > file, e.g. from 2008-08-01. > > Could you explain to me how the ChangeLog and the CVS comments should > differ semantically? AFAIK they should be identical, except for formatting, no need to indent the CVS logs with a TAB. If you use PCL-CVS to do the checkin, and first write the ChangeLog entry, it will automatically copy and reformat it into the log buffer.