From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuele Giaquinta Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/src/emacs.c,v Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:58:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20080729075853.GA1130@orion.lan> References: <20080728224640.GB894@orion.lan> <200807282259.m6SMxLOj027630@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <20080728231851.GC894@orion.lan> <200807282328.m6SNScpc012745@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217318354 11742 80.91.229.12 (29 Jul 2008 07:59:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 29 10:00:04 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNk7n-0005kR-Uz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:00:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56452 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KNk6t-0001HU-Pj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNk6n-0001Gi-Ok for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNk6l-0001Fo-Hw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:59:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49846 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KNk6l-0001Ff-Dl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:58:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:54411) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KNk6k-0004vN-RG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:58:59 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so2248782fgb.30 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:58:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to; bh=4DimGDBIouAbaucDv6xgpElMbno2sf2qOvE4piHNXoQ=; b=X+mj5y4cePUK/N4dZej65MSKcuLdAnh/XMV+T8M1hoJsO+scFmHMcLGspzc/L8SXbz sYEKwrRvQ+HXeAoql0YWLZ5MRgsAMqaIqXvIIpw4JGlkZ1+Hma1Cv4mFc5CKEZg8wDb3 ATTobGTfPRK4+OnRgXhfISUMo7Ql5ufRutgh4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to; b=hho/D77JAdWofGHKin5cbCJriLv1pGy61AATdhxJBPPcgBgILCkfWh6gwePg1zt4iW CyBt4/rRm5G4EOcehf/UaPt25hE3uwpZpRjZnKJ5IwwknnxXzA3OjXJ1JXaOF8tvS4Vv UfnfO7bsrODxfDu2DatjPE7SEg14jcFjV2GUo= Original-Received: by 10.86.98.14 with SMTP id v14mr3420366fgb.74.1217318337342; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:58:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ( [82.53.45.190]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm17475103fge.3.2008.07.29.00.58.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:58:56 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200807282328.m6SNScpc012745@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101675 Archived-At: On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:28:38PM -0700, Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > Emanuele Giaquinta writes: > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:59:21PM -0700, Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > > > > > Unfortunately that is not what the code in configure.in said: > > > > > > /* TODO: These are used for the Carbon port only. */ > > > #undef MAC_OS > > > #undef MAC_OSX > > > > > > What is the right conditional there? > > > > I think the right conditional is to check only MAC_OSX (defined in > > s/darwin.h), that code is required by unexmacosx.c. > > MAC_OSX is only define if !HAVE_NS, so that wouldn't be quite right > either. Ah, I see. The previous conditional was correct then. Emanuele