From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Don Armstrong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Mail that shuld not be sent here Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 09:22:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20080602162246.GP10430@volo.donarmstrong.com> References: <20080530165402.GR15311@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20080531154612.GA13489@volo.donarmstrong.com> <484204AA.6090709@gnu.org> <20080601175032.GD10430@volo.donarmstrong.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212423835 14700 80.91.229.12 (2 Jun 2008 16:23:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:23:55 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 02 18:24:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K3CpO-0003Fz-L0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:24:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43847 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K3Coc-0005ie-7X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:23:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3Cnw-0005Af-LF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:22:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3Cnv-00059S-V4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:22:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45414 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K3Cnv-00058x-Io for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:22:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:56125) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K3Cnv-0004dJ-Mg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:22:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m52GMYpW000310 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 09:22:34 -0700 Original-Received: (from remotemail@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m52GMWCI000309 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 09:22:32 -0700 Original-Received: (nullmailer pid 7066 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:22:46 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98243 Archived-At: On Mon, 02 Jun 2008, Richard M Stallman wrote: > Currently that same message is sent to the person who closed the bug > and any other interested parties, which is why it has that wording. > > If you automatically always remove bug-gnu-emacs from the list of > interested parties, and add the new list (emacs-bug-tracker, perhaps), > that should do what is needed. The way to do this is really with procmail on the receiving side instead of special casing this in Debbugs. Regardless, it's still blocking on someone creating the list and/or configuring procmail rules. Don Armstrong -- I'd never hurt another living thing. But if I did... It would be you. -- Chris Bishop http://www.chrisbishop.com/her/archives/her69.html http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu