From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8 Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:20:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20080527082027.GB4034@tomas> References: <87od75kt78.fsf@pdrechsler.de> <87d4nk8y3q.fsf@everybody.org> <87r6bvs3jj.fsf@pdrechsler.de> <87mymjs2qw.fsf@pdrechsler.de> <20080522041745.GA29437@tomas> <87mymixmx5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20080523090511.GA12796@tomas> <87fxs8n29l.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1211878815 6868 80.91.229.12 (27 May 2008 09:00:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 09:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Patrick Drechsler , tomas@tuxteam.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 27 11:00:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K0v0l-0000ya-C1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 May 2008 10:58:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52513 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K0v00-0003oi-9y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 May 2008 04:57:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K0uzu-0003o0-Pe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2008 04:57:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K0uzu-0003nc-4Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2008 04:57:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60052 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K0uzu-0003nV-0H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2008 04:57:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:55527) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K0uzt-0000gQ-Nl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2008 04:57:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:39907) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1K0uyI-0006sk-5V for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2008 04:55:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K0uzp-0000fZ-Mt for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2008 04:57:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [217.22.192.125] (port=41927 helo=www.elogos.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K0uzp-0000f8-4m; Tue, 27 May 2008 04:57:29 -0400 Original-Received: by www.elogos.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0316A54006; Tue, 27 May 2008 10:20:28 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fxs8n29l.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:97791 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22452 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 06:23:18AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > tomas@tuxteam.de writes: >=20 > > As for whether Emacs or nxml has the burden of skipping the BOM -- t= hat > > would correspond to whether nxml "within" Emacs is "seeing" a piece = of > > XML or a whole XML document, right? >=20 > No, I don't think so. First, as I tried to explain, I don't think > that Emacs can reliably "know" that the BOM needs to be skipped at > decoding time [...] Yes, that makes sense to me now. Thanks - -- tom=C3=A1s -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIO8RLBcgs9XrR2kYRAncjAJ938duk33W3ZcicieUZRjL/bL8qMwCdFD5S bE1vV1K+rhD7nSNq/DeqDd8=3D =3DcXki -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----