Re: autoloads question

[Emanuele Giaquinta <emanuele.giaquinta@gmail.com>]

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:28:01AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:

> >>>>> "Emanuele" == Emanuele Giaquinta <emanuele.giaquinta@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:42:09PM +0200, Juanma Barranquero wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Emanuele Giaquinta
> >> <emanuele.giaquinta@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> > -;;;;;;  "widget.el" "window.el" "x-dnd.el") (18472 4851 825214))
> >> > +;;;;;;  "widget.el" "window.el" "x-dnd.el") (18472 4853 658506))
> >> >
> >> > Is it expected?
> >> 
> >> That is a timestamp.
> 
> > Ah I see, thanks.
> > It is a bit boring because it causes an unneeded rebuild of emacs.
> 
> I use the patch below to avoid the problem,

> @@ -632,7 +725,12 @@
>  	 (current-buffer) nil nil no-autoloads this-time)
>  	(insert generate-autoload-section-trailer))
>  
> -      (save-buffer)
> +      ;; Don't modify the file if its content has not been changed, so make
> +      ;; dependencies don't trigger unnecessarily.  This fails to update the
> +      ;; time-stamp of the `no-autoloads' section, so it may cause redundant
> +      ;; scans of files in future invocations. I.e. it's a trade-off.
> +      (when changed (save-buffer))
> +
>        ;; In case autoload entries were added to other files because of
>        ;; file-local autoload-generated-file settings.
>        (autoload-save-buffers))))
> 

Wouldn't it be better to save the file mtime and restore it with
set-file-times if changed is nil?

Emanuele