hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 is considered to be obsolete

hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 is considered to be obsolete

[Peter O'Gorman]

Hi,

We are updating our emacs-22.1 packages to 22.2 and noticed that one
of the systems that we build on is planned to be desupported.

We still build and run latest emacs (with gtk etc) on HP-UX 10.20.

Peter

Re: hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 is considered to be obsolete

[YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu]

Hi, Peter,

Previously you used <bug-gnu-emacs@mlists.thewrittenword.com> as your
mail address for "emacs-22.1 with GTK problems (with patches)", which
still remains in admin/FOR-RELEASE because you became unresponsive
after your first report.  (See also
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-11/msg00031.html)
This time, you are using <emacs-devel@mlists.thewrittenword.com>.  By
what address can we reach you?

				     YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
				mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp

Re: hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 is considered to be obsolete

[Dan Nicolaescu]

"Peter O'Gorman" <emacs-devel@mlists.thewrittenword.com> writes:

  > Hi,
  > 
  > We are updating our emacs-22.1 packages to 22.2 and noticed that one
  > of the systems that we build on is planned to be desupported.
  > 
  > We still build and run latest emacs (with gtk etc) on HP-UX 10.20.

OK, it's not on the list anymore.

Can you please also verify if emacs builds and runs correctly if you
remove these lines:

#define XUINT(a) (((unsigned)(a) << BITS_PER_INT-VALBITS) >> BITS_PER_INT-VALBITS)

#define XSET(var, type, ptr) \
   ((var) = ((int)(type) << VALBITS) + (((unsigned) (ptr) <<   BITS_PER_INT-VALBITS) >> BITS_PER_INT-VALBITS))

from emacs/src/m/hp800.h ? 

Re: hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 is considered to be obsolete

[Peter O'Gorman]

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:58:07AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu wrote:
> Hi, Peter,
> 
> Previously you used <bug-gnu-emacs@mlists.thewrittenword.com> as your
> mail address for "emacs-22.1 with GTK problems (with patches)", which
> still remains in admin/FOR-RELEASE because you became unresponsive
> after your first report.  (See also
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-11/msg00031.html)
> This time, you are using <emacs-devel@mlists.thewrittenword.com>.  By
> what address can we reach you?

I'm sorry, I usually check fairly closely on lists for a few days
after I post to them to check for any followup messages. In this case
I was negligent. My email address is now in my .sig.

I will test tomorrow.

Peter
-- 
Peter O'Gorman
pogma@thewrittenword.com

Re: hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 is considered to be obsolete

[Peter O'Gorman]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:16:36PM -0700, Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
> "Peter O'Gorman" <emacs-devel@mlists.thewrittenword.com> writes:
>   > We still build and run latest emacs (with gtk etc) on HP-UX 10.20.
> 
> OK, it's not on the list anymore.
> 
> Can you please also verify if emacs builds and runs correctly if you
> remove these lines:
> from emacs/src/m/hp800.h ?

It builds and runs (although the "run" test was simply to start, open
a file, and exit, is that sufficient?). 

Peter
-- 
Peter O'Gorman
pogma@thewrittenword.com

Re: hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 is considered to be obsolete

[Dan Nicolaescu]

"Peter O'Gorman" <emacs-devel@mlists.thewrittenword.com> writes:

  > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:16:36PM -0700, Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
  > > "Peter O'Gorman" <emacs-devel@mlists.thewrittenword.com> writes:
  > >   > We still build and run latest emacs (with gtk etc) on HP-UX 10.20.
  > > 
  > > OK, it's not on the list anymore.
  > > 
  > > Can you please also verify if emacs builds and runs correctly if you
  > > remove these lines:
  > > from emacs/src/m/hp800.h ?
  > 
  > It builds and runs (although the "run" test was simply to start, open
  > a file, and exit, is that sufficient?). 

Thanks, that should be sufficient.

Solaris 2.6 no recursive mutex (was:Re: hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 is considered to be obsolete)

[Peter O'Gorman]

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:58:07AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu wrote:
> Previously you used <bug-gnu-emacs@mlists.thewrittenword.com> as your
> mail address for "emacs-22.1 with GTK problems (with patches)", which
> still remains in admin/FOR-RELEASE because you became unresponsive
> after your first report.

The patch at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2007-09/msg00083.html
works for us.

Thanks,
Peter
-- 
Peter O'Gorman
pogma@thewrittenword.com

Re: Solaris 2.6 no recursive mutex (was:Re: hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 is considered to be obsolete)

[YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu]

>>>>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:18:02 -0500, "Peter O'Gorman" <emacs-devel@mlists.thewrittenword.com> said:

> The patch at
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2007-09/msg00083.html
> works for us.

Thanks.  I've installed it to the EMACS_22_BASE branch, and removed
the corresponding admin/FOR-RELEASE entry.

				     YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
				mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp