From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; TRAMP fails to copy a gzip'ed file Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:18:51 -0700 Message-ID: <200803111618.m2BGIqYQ007342@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> References: <6351A346-5EE7-4B65-9742-B16C56D689A4@gmx.de> <0A425FC8-F47F-488D-99FB-FA357B21C856@gmx.de> <1663FCE9-D7C8-4E02-8A52-F6982A88049F@freenet.de> <417D82EC-E8E3-4F1F-BDAE-E153AF45FCBB@freenet.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205253211 5175 80.91.229.12 (11 Mar 2008 16:33:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Michael Albinus To: Peter Dyballa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 11 17:33:54 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZ7QG-0001ew-PK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:33:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ7Ph-0008A6-1y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:33:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ7Pd-00089W-59 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:33:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ7PY-000863-3b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:33:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ7PX-00085x-TG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ7PW-00076M-O0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:33:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ7PU-0007I1-Mz for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ7Dh-0004iy-VY for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:20:56 -0400 Original-Received: from sallyv1.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.109]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ7Dh-0004i8-Fj for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:20:53 -0400 X-ICS-MailScanner-Watermark: 1205857135.66292@ytUJb/bzt0znlxZ/DA5vFQ Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by sallyv1.ics.uci.edu (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m2BGIqYQ007342; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:18:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <417D82EC-E8E3-4F1F-BDAE-E153AF45FCBB@freenet.de> (Peter Dyballa's message of "Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:12:50 +0100") Original-Lines: 37 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92167 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21530 Archived-At: Peter Dyballa writes: > Am 11.03.2008 um 15:16 schrieb Michael Albinus: >=20 > > Peter Dyballa writes: > > > >> The output of cksum is in both cases the same: 1268136719 956556 > >> . > >> > >> I have prepared 2 files, one with uncompressed 11964 bytes, the other > >> with 11965 bytes uncompressed. I'll try the verbose test with the > >> bigger file ... > > > > Just one check: does the problem happen only with large compressed > > files, or does it happen also with large uncompressed files? > > > > If it doesn't in the latter case, then it might be a problem of saving > > the binary data from the temporary buffer. Maybe something because of > > the unicode merge (wild guess, I know). > > >=20 > There might be even more bugs! Yesterday I built my test files on > command line with split. In dired i gzip'ed them =E2=80=93 und two lines > became one! Today I tried to gunzip the two files to test > uncompressed transfer =E2=80=93 and again two lines became one in dired= . At > both times only one file was gzip'ed or gunzip'ed. >=20 > Uncompresses text (LOG) files up to almost 16 MB are transferred > fine. My check was simple: viewing the original file in dired and > viewing the copy in dired. Then doing a compare-windows. >=20 > I also fetched the files with sftp and invoked diff on the command > line, diff between the copied and the sftp'ed file. The differences > found were new log entries. Can you please try doing this with an emacs built with --without-x and without passing any other CFLAGS, LDFLAGS, etc.