From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: lisp-indent-line and comment-region in emacs-lisp-mode menu Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:23:59 -0800 Message-ID: <200803042223.m24MNxAA001171@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204669580 27096 80.91.229.12 (4 Mar 2008 22:26:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:26:20 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 04 23:26:47 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWfaw-0007se-HD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 23:26:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWfaP-0006sV-8y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:26:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWfaK-0006s6-Ga for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:26:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWfaJ-0006rk-34 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:26:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWfaI-0006rh-V8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:26:07 -0500 Original-Received: from sallyv1.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.109]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWfaI-0003Hq-Jj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:26:06 -0500 X-ICS-MailScanner-Watermark: 1205274240.73779@q0+6d0DQMh7pkF5xC7iBWA Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by sallyv1.ics.uci.edu (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m24MNxAA001171 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 14:23:59 -0800 (PST) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 8 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91324 Archived-At: Wouldn't it be better if the emacs-lisp-mode menu used indent-for-tab-command instead of lisp-indent-line and comment-dwim instead of comment-region ? The former don't have key bindings, but the latter do, so the menus do not help users learn the key bindings. What about "Indent region"? Currently TAB does when transient-mark-mode is on...