From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Don Armstrong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#25: Acknowledgement (frame parameter menu-bar-lines changes height of frame) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:02:35 -0800 Message-ID: <20080301000235.GE7406@rzlab.ucr.edu> References: <003301c87ae6$b2175740$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204329779 29156 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2008 00:02:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 00:02:59 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 01 01:03:24 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JVFCE-0003mi-1H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:03:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JVFBh-0003IZ-E2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:02:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JVFBb-0003GU-W7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:02:44 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JVFBa-0003F3-5D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:02:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JVFBa-0003F0-19 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:02:42 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JVFBZ-0000lL-EG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:02:41 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (archimedes.ucr.edu [138.23.92.79]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with SMTP id m2102f4f000449 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:02:42 -0800 Original-Received: (nullmailer pid 23992 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:02:35 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <003301c87ae6$b2175740$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90933 Archived-At: On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Drew Adams wrote: > We should be able to keep the same thread as the original bug-report > mail, and reply to that, _as before_. Same thread, subject line, > reply-to, etc. We should continue to be able to sort mails by > thread, sender, etc. in our mail clients, and not have a thread get > split into different subjects, addresses, etc. Assuming the emacs developers decide to use debbugs, each bug has it's own list, and you'll send more information to bugnum@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com[1] so thread sorting etc. will all happen as you're expecting it to, assuming References: and In-Reply-To: are kept intact by correspondents. > Also, there is no inclusion of the original bug report, and no > mention of the date it was filed (10 months ago, in this case - so > much for "Thank you for filing a new bug report"). Instead, there is > a URL to a Web site - not equivalent. When everything is working normally, you will get such an ack within minutes of filing a new report (so sending you back the original bug report wouldn't really be useful.) Don Armstrong 1: Well, obviously not to my machine, but some equivalent address. -- A Democracy lead by politicians and political parties, fails. http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu