From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.50; Emacs CVS segfaults on M-x delete-frame on Debian sarge under XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:08:09 -0800 Message-ID: <200802271708.m1RH89Is021334@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> References: <86ve4afm4d.fsf@cpan.org> <47C58E33.2040701@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204132449 22606 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2008 17:14:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C6var_Arnfj=F6r=F0?= Bjarmason To: Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 27 18:14:31 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JUPq8-0006um-NF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:13:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUPpb-0004o0-PZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:12:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUPo3-0003pQ-7J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:10:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUPo1-0003oW-UX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:10:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUPo1-0003oH-AX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:10:57 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUPo0-0006uk-Vo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:10:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JUPo0-0006J2-Nf for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:10:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUPnx-0006tw-Eb for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:10:56 -0500 Original-Received: from sallyv1.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.109]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUPnx-0006tM-1H for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:10:53 -0500 X-ICS-MailScanner-Watermark: 1204736890.70064@3AXQ7b0bGJ7pNgZj0R1jtg Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by sallyv1.ics.uci.edu (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m1RH89Is021334; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:08:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <47C58E33.2040701@swipnet.se> ("Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv=22?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?'s?= message of "Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:22:11 +0100") Original-Lines: 10 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90634 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21317 Archived-At: Jan Dj=E4rv writes: > It is a well known bug in Gtk+ when closing a display. Use Gtk+ 2.10 > or newer. The bug is not fully fixed there either, but it just leaks > memory, it doesn't crash. How about printing a warning about problems with older Gtk versions configure time? It seems likely that people will run into this if they start playing with the multi-tty functionality ...