From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: User-Agent header Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:00:19 +0100 Organization: GNU's Not UNIX! Message-ID: <200802260200.m1Q20JDQ006832@localhost.localdomain> References: <87lk5aezyv.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Xavier Maillard NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203993303 19165 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2008 02:35:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wohler@newt.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 26 03:35:28 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JTpf1-000694-HY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:35:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JTpeV-0002fk-KF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:34:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JTpeD-0002QI-Uo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:34:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JTpeC-0002OT-Ex for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:34:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JTpeC-0002O8-1x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:34:24 -0500 Original-Received: from master.uucpssh.org ([193.218.105.66]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JTpeB-0007wD-Ja for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:34:23 -0500 Original-Received: by master.uucpssh.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id A5EBDC770E; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:32:40 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:1000@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1Q20R8F006849; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:00:27 +0100 Original-Received: (from xma@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id m1Q20JDQ006832; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:00:19 +0100 In-reply-to: <87lk5aezyv.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (stephen@xemacs.org) User-Agent: Rmail in GNU Emacs 23.0.60.2 on GNU/Linux Jabber-ID: xma01@jabber.fr X-uucpssh: Found to be clean X-uucpssh-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.441, required 4.6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, SPF_HELO_PASS -0.00) X-uucpssh-From: xma@gnu.org X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90462 Archived-At: > MH-E is still using X-Mailer (although we could update the format > of the header field to conform with this draft). That's the right thing to do for a mail-only MUA, IMO. I read all the RFC 2616 and I think this what I'll do but I will try to conform to the RFC 2616 even with a X-Mailer header (Note: this is not the case yet). Thank you all for your clarifications. By the way, what do people think about either the patch or my proposition to change the behaviour of b-u-b-f variable ? Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org