From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Extensive changes during pretest Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:20:54 +0000 Message-ID: <20080224082054.GA1073@muc.de> References: <20080223215234.GA3476@muc.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203846902 24631 80.91.229.12 (24 Feb 2008 09:55:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:55:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 24 10:55:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JTDZu-00071V-4N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:55:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JTDZO-0004RB-Jt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 04:54:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JTDZJ-0004Qx-FJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 04:54:49 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JTDZG-0004PJ-T5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 04:54:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JTDZG-0004P1-DK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 04:54:46 -0500 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1] helo=mail.muc.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JTDZF-0004cO-OH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 04:54:46 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 56281 invoked by uid 3782); 24 Feb 2008 08:08:02 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p57AF58BD.dip.t-dialin.net [87.175.88.189]) by colin2.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:08:00 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 1095 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Feb 2008 08:20:54 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.5 (Fettercairn) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90214 Archived-At: Hi, Eli, On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 06:18:41AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:52:35 +0000 > > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > From: Alan Mackenzie > > > 2008-02-19 Alan Mackenzie > > > Set of changes so that "obtrusive" syntactic elements in a > > > C/C++/ObjC preprocessor line (e.g. an unbalanced string quote > > > or unmatched paren) don't interact syntactically with stuff > > > outside the CPP line. > > [ .... ] > > This was to fix a bug reported by a user. I decided to fix it > > properly, rather than with some temporary cludge (they rarely work > > well). The bug report was: > Was that bug really that grave to warrant such extensive changes at the > last moment? I think it was. The only workaround would require the user to change his source code (or use a different editor). Possibly I was mistaken. > The bug was in incorrect fontification, right? Incorrect fontification over the entire buffer after the #warning line (or at least until the next apostrophe within a comment). It also made M-[ae] (statement/sentence movement) and C-M-[ae] (function movement) and probably quite a lot else (anything involving the syntax table) go haywire. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).