From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Don Armstrong <don@donarmstrong.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Debbugs testbed
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:49:03 -0800
Message-ID: <20080221014903.GE23349@rzlab.ucr.edu>
References: <20080220021827.GR1092@rzlab.ucr.edu>
	<E1JRs3W-0005uq-UP@fencepost.gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203566847 25211 80.91.229.12 (21 Feb 2008 04:07:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:07:27 +0000 (UTC)
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 21 05:07:51 2008
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1JS2ir-0007DD-PW
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:07:50 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JS2iM-0000c5-Ns
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:07:18 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JS0Yi-0006Hj-Ci
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:49:12 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JS0Yh-0006HS-4B
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:49:12 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JS0Yg-0006HP-U4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:49:10 -0500
Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <don@rzlab.ucr.edu>) id 1JS0Yg-0004bZ-9R
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:49:10 -0500
Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (archimedes.ucr.edu [138.23.92.79])
	by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with SMTP id m1L1n3ma023510
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:49:04 -0800
Original-Received: (nullmailer pid 15728 invoked by uid 1000);
	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:49:03 -0000
Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1JRs3W-0005uq-UP@fencepost.gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:05:27 -0500
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89778
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/89778>

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Richard Stallman wrote:
>     I've configured a testbed of debbugs that can be used. There currently
>     is one package configured (emacs), and a temporary mailing list,
>     emacsbugs@lists.donarmstrong.com is set as the maintainer.
> 
> To make this a real test, we need to arrange to get all bug reports
> into it.  That can be done by humans, or automatically (if that proves
> feasible).  Can you write a script to process the messages sent by
> M-x report-emacs-bug and put them in automatically?

If someone can bounce me one of these reports, it's no problem. [Once
I've got the code, we can arrange to Cc: from wherever the reports are
going now to an address @emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com or similar.]


Don Armstrong

-- 
Dropping non-free would set us back at least, what, 300 packages? It'd
take MONTHS to make up the difference, and meanwhile Debian users will
be fleeing to SLACKWARE.

And what about SHAREHOLDER VALUE? 
 -- Matt Zimmerman in <gYuD3D.A.ayC.nGB39@murphy>

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu