From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacsclient bug Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:00:48 -0800 Message-ID: <200802070100.m1710xcR017028@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> References: <200801271541.m0RFfGE6016267@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200802061740.m16HeX90025576@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202346222 22312 80.91.229.12 (7 Feb 2008 01:03:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wilde@sha-bang.de, lenbok@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 07 02:04:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JMvBJ-00070W-Bz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:04:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JMvAq-0003dr-RU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:03:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMvAm-0003dd-VD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:03:29 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMvAl-0003dH-Uo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:03:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JMvAl-0003dE-Qk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:03:27 -0500 Original-Received: from sallyv1.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.109]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JMvAh-0000vh-Pm; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:03:24 -0500 X-ICS-MailScanner-Watermark: 1202950860.58899@FGDSWNEnsbAsEEChOcQ3cQ Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by sallyv1.ics.uci.edu (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m1710xcR017028; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:00:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:44:28 -0500") Original-Lines: 17 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88378 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > > Of course, if your Emacs server has both X11 and tty frames, then "-c" > > will arbitrarily open either a tty frame or an X11 frame depending on > > which frame happens to be selected when the emacsclient connects to it. > > Given that, taking into account the current frame when emacsclient > connects does not seem like a good idea. > > I disagree. I think that what -c does is the right default. > It says "make a new frame". Making it on the same terminal > is clearly the best default. I think you misunderstood that part, the lines you cited were about `(current-frame)'. See a few lines below in my original message that I was saying the same thing that you want.