From: "Andreas Röhler" <andreas.roehler@online.de>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Cc: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>,
Mike Mattie <codermattie@gmail.com>,
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,
Robert Chassell <bob@rattlesnake.com>,
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>, "Leo, " <sdl.web@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Change the default binding of C-x C-e ?
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 07:53:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801070753.51953.andreas.roehler@online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvsl1asng8.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Am Sonntag, 6. Januar 2008 21:35 schrieb Stefan Monnier:
> > It is sometimes useful whilst hacking lisp to evaluate an expression in
> > the middle of a defun. You'd be surprised how often that happens.
> > That's what C-x C-e is for, and I'd bet my entire life savings on the
> > rest of the Emacs team agreeing here.
>
> I'd agree, but I also think that maybe the OP has a point: C-x C-e when
> used after an expression such as (defvar foo 1) should, just like C-M-x
> force `foo' to be reset to 1.
>
>
> Stefan
>
Would welcome that.
Presently, while playing around with new code, `devfar'
is not comfortable, as it defends it's value once set.
If values are still experimental, I use `setq'
instead. From what follows a need to correct that
afterwards. With this changing we would get rid of that
need and avoid possible errors.
Right?
Andreas Röhler
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-07 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-06 11:41 Change the default binding of C-x C-e ? Mike Mattie
2008-01-06 14:59 ` Leo
2008-01-06 15:14 ` Mike Mattie
2008-01-06 15:17 ` Alan Mackenzie
2008-01-06 20:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-07 6:53 ` Andreas Röhler [this message]
2008-01-07 4:18 ` Richard Stallman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-06 17:21 Robert J. Chassell
2008-01-06 19:45 ` Tom Tromey
2008-01-07 0:15 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200801070753.51953.andreas.roehler@online.de \
--to=andreas.roehler@online.de \
--cc=acm@muc.de \
--cc=bob@rattlesnake.com \
--cc=codermattie@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=sdl.web@gmail.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).