From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:36:38 -0800 Message-ID: <200801070336.m073acDi006408@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> References: <200801020445.m024jWU2008538@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200801031805.m03I5SBf022748@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200801050901.m0591mQj011970@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <20080105143415.GG30869@thyrsus.com> <200801061037.m06AbIRD004966@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200801070259.m072xY0s005194@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <20080107032649.GD9473@thyrsus.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199677032 29603 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2008 03:37:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 03:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tom Tromey , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , rms@gnu.org, harsanyi@mac.com To: esr@thyrsus.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 07 04:37:32 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JBinq-0008Ry-9I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 04:37:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBinT-0002QE-Ej for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:37:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JBinP-0002Q8-Dx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JBinO-0002Pv-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBinO-0002Ps-Pt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JBinK-0005cT-VJ; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m073acDi006408; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 19:36:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20080107032649.GD9473@thyrsus.com> (Eric S. Raymond's message of "Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:26:49 -0500") Original-Lines: 29 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86421 Archived-At: "Eric S. Raymond" writes: > Dan Nicolaescu : > > Stefan Monnier writes: > > > > > > Appended is a patch to make it work with svn. This patch is kind of a > > > > hack in that, if vc-status ever wants to support "non-terse" mode, > > > > then the function will have to be rewritten (since "svn status" and > > > > "svn status -v" have different formats). > > > > > > If we introduce a new non-dired thingy, I suggest we don't even try to > > > provide a non-terse mode. There are so many more important features to > > > add that we may as well decide from the get go that we'll never get to > > > that one. > > > > 100% agreement. > > Seems reasonable to me as well, except -- do we really want to show all > uncontrolled files and have no option to suppress them? IMO we should show them. We might need to add a new back-end command to add the files to the ignored list. This is no different when using the VCS from the command line, as long as you don't explicitly ignore unregistered files (and they are not ignored by some default rule), they will should up in the output of many commands.