From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, harsanyi@mac.com, rms@gnu.org,
monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:22:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801070322.m073MiNR005963@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3y7b2sp0e.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:00:33 -0700")
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
> I don't understand how the 'dir' argument works with the existing
> vc-hg-dir-status. The argument is never used in the function. When I
> tried vc-status on a mercurial working directory, I got results for
> the whole tree, not the particular subdirectory I requested, which is
> also weird.
It's a bug in vc-hg-dir-status (and in vc-hg-dir-state). I fixed it.
Thanks!
> The resulting buffer is always called *vc-status*, which is
> unfriendly. Perhaps it should be named after the requested directory.
No opinion here. PCL-CVS calls it *cvs*, and it does not seem like a big
issue when using it.
> I think it would be best to make vc-status work asynchronously from the
> very beginning. That is what pcl-cvs and psvn do, and it is nicer to
> use on larger trees. I think this is important to do first because it
> is simpler to redesign the back end hooks now, if needed.
Good idea. Not sure what is the best way to do this. Feel free to change
it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-07 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-28 17:45 Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored Eric S. Raymond
2007-12-28 23:01 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2007-12-29 2:48 ` Alexandru Harsanyi
2007-12-29 11:45 ` Eric S. Raymond
2008-01-02 2:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-02 2:19 ` Eric S. Raymond
2008-01-02 4:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-02 4:45 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-02 11:50 ` Eric S. Raymond
2008-01-02 17:31 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-03 9:50 ` Richard Stallman
2008-01-03 18:05 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-03 18:19 ` Eric S. Raymond
2008-01-05 5:54 ` Richard Stallman
2008-01-05 9:01 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-05 14:34 ` Eric S. Raymond
2008-01-05 22:25 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-06 10:37 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-06 15:57 ` Eric S. Raymond
2008-01-18 23:31 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-06 20:00 ` Tom Tromey
2008-01-06 21:03 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-07 2:59 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-07 3:26 ` Eric S. Raymond
2008-01-07 3:36 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-07 3:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-07 12:56 ` Eric S. Raymond
2008-01-07 15:31 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-07 11:30 ` Richard Stallman
2008-01-07 12:54 ` Eric S. Raymond
2008-01-07 15:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-08 19:06 ` Richard Stallman
2008-01-08 19:34 ` Miles Bader
2008-01-07 3:22 ` Dan Nicolaescu [this message]
2008-01-07 3:03 ` Tom Tromey
2008-01-07 4:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-07 21:15 ` PCL-CVS buffers (was: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored) Reiner Steib
2008-01-08 2:33 ` PCL-CVS buffers Stefan Monnier
2008-01-18 23:46 ` Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-19 0:10 ` Tom Tromey
2008-01-19 1:20 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-19 6:00 ` Tom Tromey
2008-01-19 17:05 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-19 19:40 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-19 21:01 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2008-01-20 17:18 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-20 20:24 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2008-01-20 17:08 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-20 19:08 ` Tom Tromey
2008-01-20 20:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-20 19:45 ` Tom Tromey
2008-01-22 1:35 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-19 20:03 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2008-01-20 19:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-20 20:30 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2008-01-21 15:18 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-21 15:30 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-21 15:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-21 15:34 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2008-01-06 8:09 ` Richard Stallman
2008-01-02 11:46 ` Eric S. Raymond
2008-01-02 20:38 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-02 22:11 ` Eric S. Raymond
2008-01-02 23:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-02 23:29 ` Eric S. Raymond
2008-01-03 14:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-03 17:41 ` Eric S. Raymond
2008-01-05 5:54 ` Richard Stallman
2008-01-02 23:13 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-01-02 23:33 ` Eric S. Raymond
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200801070322.m073MiNR005963@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu \
--to=dann@ics.uci.edu \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=esr@thyrsus.com \
--cc=harsanyi@mac.com \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).