From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: about remember.el Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:15:25 -0700 Message-ID: <200710312115.l9VLFU8k010272@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193865395 12321 80.91.229.12 (31 Oct 2007 21:16:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:16:35 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 31 22:16:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1InKvN-0002pu-MP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:16:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1InKvD-0003zd-Ui for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:16:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1InKvA-0003xe-RJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:16:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1InKv9-0003wu-R0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:16:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1InKv9-0003wr-Js for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:16:15 -0400 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1InKv8-00089X-Sd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:16:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l9VLFU8k010272 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:15:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Lines: 19 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-0.84, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, J_CHICKENPOX_82 0.60) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82254 Archived-At: remember.el is a nice and useful package, but does it need so many autoloaded functions? remember-destroy surely does not need to be autoloaded. Is remember-region really necessary? Wouldn't it be better if `remeber' would just do what `remeber-region' does if the region is active? Many commands have been changed lately to do something different when the region is active, this looks like a good application of the same principle. `remember-buffer' also seems that is not needed, C-x h M-x remeber-region RET should do the same thing. remember-mode-map could be defined and initialized in one step.