From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [veekae@gmail.com: bug in vc-state functions in Emacs v 22.1] Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:30:53 -0700 Message-ID: <200710280230.l9S2UrHb002956@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> References: <200710261734.l9QHYWXY005717@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193538836 14812 80.91.229.12 (28 Oct 2007 02:33:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 02:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esr@snark.thyrsus.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 28 03:33:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IlxyP-0007kn-Ir for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 03:33:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IlxyG-0004kq-Iv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:33:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IlxyD-0004kl-80 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:33:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IlxyB-0004kW-PP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IlxyB-0004kD-Gm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:33:43 -0400 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ilxy6-0002ym-A5; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:33:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l9S2UrHb002956; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:30:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat\, 27 Oct 2007 09\:57\:43 -0400") Original-Lines: 21 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.16, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, FS_SINGLE_LETTER 1.00, J_CHICKENPOX_31 0.60) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81914 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > I can't reproduce this. > > GNU Emacs 21.4.1 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars) > of 2006-03-07 on hs20-bc1-6.build.redhat.com > up-to-date > up-to-date > up-to-date > > The bug report used 21.3, I tried it with 21.4. AFAIR the only > difference between the 2 is some security bug that had nothing to do > with VC. > > Whether it fails in Emacs 21 is not really important since we do not > maintain that any more. What matters is, does this fail in Emacs 22? > And does it fail in the trunk? > > Could you check those two? I don't see anything wrong with either of those.