From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: TAB when the region is active Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:59:15 -0700 Message-ID: <200709142159.l8ELxFpE029330@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189807250 22398 80.91.229.12 (14 Sep 2007 22:00:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:00:50 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 15 00:00:47 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IWJDT-0002Rl-0P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:00:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IWJDS-0002kQ-KG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:00:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IWJDO-0002fj-Ks for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:00:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IWJDN-0002eC-WD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:00:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IWJDN-0002dr-PT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:00:41 -0400 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IWJDM-0007pL-Uh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:00:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l8ELxFpE029330 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Lines: 9 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-Detected-Kernel: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78917 Archived-At: A few commands (like replace-string/regexp, undo, etc) change their behavior if transient-mark-mode is on and the mark is active: they apply only to the active region. Similarly, wouldn't it be better if TAB would run indent-region if the region is active? Opinions?