From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding xterm-extras to Emacs Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:58:08 -0700 Message-ID: <200709131658.l8DGw86P000060@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> References: <200706122221.l5CMLMoY018433@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200706122243.l5CMhMLv019775@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200706130047.l5D0lqUE027336@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <877iq8kx46.fsf@dur.ac.uk> <200706131415.l5DEF98f009840@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200706140508.l5E58mP0007225@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189702863 31207 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2007 17:01:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:01:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 13 19:01:00 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IVs3c-0003tL-RW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:00:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVs3c-0001IR-8Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:00:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVs3Z-0001IF-9D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:00:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVs3W-0001Hk-Pz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:00:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVs3W-0001Hf-Kk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:00:42 -0400 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IVs3W-0000zg-5V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:00:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l8DGw86P000060; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:58:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Thu\, 13 Sep 2007 17\:40\:54 +0100") Original-Lines: 27 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-0.84, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, J_CHICKENPOX_52 0.60) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-Detected-Kernel: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78793 Archived-At: Leo writes: > On 2007-06-14 06:08 +0100, Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > > Stefan Monnier writes: > > > > > I guess it made sense then, but now I encourage people to add such > > > exhaustive keybinding to term/xterm.el. Ideally, part of the contents of > > > term/xterm.el should be auto-generated from the source code (or the doc) of > > > the xterm program, so we can be sure we're complete and up-to-date. > > > > I don't think that the docs or the source code are too amenable to > > automatic analysis (although I would love to be proven wrong in > > practice). > > > > I will start adding M-S- bindings when I have some free time to play > > with this. If people can point out what other bindings should be added > > that would be very helpful. Any help/patches are more than welcome. > > I have installed the newest xterm.el and now it seems M-S- key bindings > work in xterm. > > However, C-S- and C-M- still don't. If you want to be helpful, please show an exact list of what keys are not working. But before doing that, please make sure that xterm can generate those keys, not all key combinations are possible.