Hi,

On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 08:59:28PM +0100, Leo wrote:
> On 2007-09-01 20:13 +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Come on, people. If the point is above `something' and I don't want EMACS to
> > return an URL-string but NIL, why would I run (thing-at-point 'url) in the
> > first place? This is bogus.
> 
> To test if there is a url under point, if yes do something if not do
> something else.

Okay, that is something else.

> > I like the behaviour as it is right now. Returning nil is as unusable
> > as http://something for most, but for some people, http://something
> > can still be of use.
> 
> Those claims are not true.

Which claims? I talk from experience. I really make use of the current
behaviour.

	Hannes