From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Levin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [zslevin@gmail.com: [Bug] Emacs frozen in python mode with which-func & narrow]: Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:57:14 +0800 Message-ID: <200708080957.14381.zslevin@gmail.com> References: <200708061000.11896.zslevin@gmail.com> <200708062335.26976.pogonyshev@gmx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb18030" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1186538289 13029 80.91.229.12 (8 Aug 2007 01:58:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 01:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, Paul Pogonyshev To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 08 03:58:07 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IIaoJ-0004Vm-7h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 03:58:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IIaoI-0002BF-P1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:58:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IIaoG-0002BA-2X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:58:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IIaoD-0002Ay-CQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IIaoD-0002Av-85 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:58:01 -0400 Original-Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.204.227]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IIaoC-0002V8-R0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:58:01 -0400 Original-Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id e6so8831qbe for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:57:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=PL9nEiJ4yiEMkOLBdJG1HleoxKsApVBw+GtPo6ibjJUOrCRLbTELjyGjGdM/sEGLrtlqNo02GUn+FTbqAwvCJWS0MKUVlJEOGFGx5OaQmwdQuQ2SeESW2tnG+08k+/vHAcb2PGX9PfD0ypS90Y7UJFME8Ykfj9hXmnOxPGx8TCg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=XNbVVpuWfR7pROTNyqJrQVCguJ31GWlGmIDuZ2X3eWudF3XZcDjfn5hEqW8YKzy63CCLWlDYUxQAuoAiyrIHGtAALkQynq8pIs3WvmuUDgGxpmyQAtNBZQldgCFAq0J+Yz6ZsOwbAu7F4aaGx7lzE5PBYep3Airvayj/tQqmB84= Original-Received: by 10.141.21.19 with SMTP id y19mr155443rvi.1186538279045; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:57:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from levcom ( [61.234.125.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b8sm126736rvf.2007.08.07.18.57.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:57:57 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 In-Reply-To: <200708062335.26976.pogonyshev@gmx.net> Content-Disposition: inline X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76171 Archived-At: Paul Pogonyshev Wrote: > Levin wrote: > > Yes, it has been fixed with the latest CVS copy. Thanks. > > Hm, it stroke me suddenly that your bug report might have been > about stable Emacs release (22.1.) Is that the case? Because > the patch wouldn't apply cleanly to 22.2 branch, so then it's > needed to backport it. > > Paul I'm using CVS copy. But I try 22.1 version just now: which-func-mode is not available in python mode (I toggle it, but nothing displayed), and the bug does not exist. Levin