From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?q?R=F6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: elib -> emacs Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:59:56 +0200 Message-ID: <200706182059.57040.andreas.roehler@online.de> References: <200706160029.l5G0Tv318102@f7.net> <200706162119.49853.andreas.roehler@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182192945 4221 80.91.229.12 (18 Jun 2007 18:55:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 18 20:55:42 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I0MO5-0004kI-0i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:55:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0MO4-0003JM-IG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:55:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I0MO1-0003J9-D3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:55:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I0MNz-0003Ik-MA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:55:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0MNz-0003Ih-Gv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:55:35 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I0MNy-0002hz-Tg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:55:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [84.190.193.205] (helo=karton) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu5) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML25U-1I0MNb1QNu-0006Pa; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:55:12 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+QPrSYO5dBNTkNP84f2o2Ajre1QifBTyeiFQI QviuNWxdURbmtkG1zEsCmZx0O5RpfxVgbkGJwh/vlty5SnUEAj b4IrXSY36hdf1vi6pEepQ== X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73242 Archived-At: Am Montag, 18. Juni 2007 17:36 schrieb Stefan Monnier: > > This directory includes stack-f.el and string.el from > > Elib 1.0. > > Why use stack-f.el? This part of elib has always seemed rather pointless: > cons cells provide perfectly good stacks already. > > As for string.el, which part do you use? It seems this is equivalent > functionality in Emacs-22 for most if not all of it already. > > > Stefan > > > PS: The only interesting part of elib seemed to me to be cookie.el (mostly > included in Emacs as ewoc.el) and avltree.el, although I haven't seen many > uses of avltree.el around. > As it turned out meanwhile, I misunderstood OP in such, as I assumed elib-library already part of Emacs and doomed to drop. Question was raised different. Andreas Roehler