From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Post-22.1 development? Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:59:03 -0700 Message-ID: <200706101559.l5AFxBFb006829@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> References: <878xb05ras.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181491585 28753 80.91.229.12 (10 Jun 2007 16:06:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:06:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 10 18:06:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HxPvn-0007Rd-Ah for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:06:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HxPvm-0000up-VR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:06:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HxPr8-00010o-It for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:01:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HxPr5-0000xp-Jm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:01:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HxPr5-0000xa-D1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:01:27 -0400 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HxPr4-00063e-5q; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:01:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5AFxBFb006829; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:59:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon\, 04 Jun 2007 12\:44\:09 -0400") Original-Lines: 13 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72582 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > As for the trunk, should we begin merging the unicode branch in? > > Let's wait a couple of months. I think it will be easier to move some > changes selectively to the Emacs 22 branch if we have not included > unicode-2 in the trunk. As of now, any change in the trunk would work > in the branch. After unicode-2 is installed, many changes will be > done differently, and they won't work unchanged in the Emacs 22 branch. How about merging the multi-tty branch? The changes on that branch are much more localized, so porting fixes from the trunk to the EMACS_22 branch should not be a big issue.