From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: vera-mode.el Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:38:23 -0700 Message-ID: <200706062338.l56NcSrt009870@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> References: <4665C2DC.3090102@synopsys.com> <4666EB5D.7040909@gnu.org> <46672780.30202@synopsys.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181173278 30398 80.91.229.12 (6 Jun 2007 23:41:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 23:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Reto Zimmermann Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 07 01:41:17 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hw57r-0002JD-Qv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 01:41:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hw57r-0006vj-FG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:41:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hw57J-0006jE-9k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:40:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hw57I-0006ir-Nv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:40:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hw57I-0006in-Hy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:40:40 -0400 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hw57I-0006AR-11 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:40:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l56NcSrt009870; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:38:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46672780.30202@synopsys.com> (Reto Zimmermann's message of "Wed\, 06 Jun 2007 23\:30\:40 +0200") Original-Lines: 21 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72391 Archived-At: Thanks for submitting this code! Reto Zimmermann writes: > (defface vera-font-lock-number-face Faces don't have "-face" suffix anymore now, some face names have been kept for compatibility, but it would be good not to introduce new ones. > (defface vera-font-lock-function-face Any reason you are not using font-lock-function-name-face here? font-lock is on by default in emacs-22, so there's a set of 15 predefined faces that you could use. Can you use the predefined font-lock faces for any of the faces that vera-mode uses?