From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [multi-tty] Emacs port status Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 08:49:06 -0700 Message-ID: <200705201549.l4KFn6W3012902@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> References: <464CC097.10700@gnu.org> <85abw3up91.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179676267 18027 80.91.229.12 (20 May 2007 15:51:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 15:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 20 17:51:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HpngX-0002Hl-05 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 17:51:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HpngW-0006RW-L9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 11:51:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HpngT-0006RP-N8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 11:51:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HpngR-0006Q4-68 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 11:51:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HpngR-0006Q1-1u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 11:50:59 -0400 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HpngP-0006NO-Fi; Sun, 20 May 2007 11:50:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l4KFn6W3012902; Sun, 20 May 2007 08:49:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri\, 18 May 2007 17\:56\:16 +0300") Original-Lines: 22 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71428 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > From: David Kastrup > > Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:14:18 +0200 > > Cc: Emacs Devel > > > > Jason Rumney writes: > > > > > Thanks to some help from Dan Nicolaescu, I think we have reached a > > > point with the Windows port where I would be comfortable merging > > > into the trunk. > > > > That was pleasantly fast. Of the other ports, probably the MSDOS port > > will provide the most puzzlers. > > I'm not sure I will continue the MSDOS support in Emacs 23. It sounds > like Emacs 23 will be Unicode-based; if that is indeed so, it will be > most probably well beyond my resources to make all the Unicode-related > features work on MSDOS. If you decide you want to still keep the MSDOS port, don't let multi-tty deter you, a port is not hard to do.