From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [multi-tty] xt-mouse.el does not work in emacsclient frames Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:55:03 -0700 Message-ID: <200705182055.l4IKt3iQ025860@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> References: <200705170044.l4H0i46s007856@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200705182017.l4IKHnqa025118@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179521817 11420 80.91.229.12 (18 May 2007 20:56:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 20:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: csant Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 18 22:56:55 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hp9VN-00047J-B6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 May 2007 22:56:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hp9VM-0004Z6-QV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 May 2007 16:56:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hp9VJ-0004Yt-Bh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2007 16:56:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hp9VI-0004Yg-3F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2007 16:56:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hp9VH-0004Yd-Rn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2007 16:56:47 -0400 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hp9VH-0000rz-9F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2007 16:56:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l4IKt3iQ025860; Fri, 18 May 2007 13:55:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (csant@csant.info's message of "Fri\, 18 May 2007 22\:43\:04 +0200") Original-Lines: 14 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-0.627, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, INFO_TLD 0.81) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71344 Archived-At: csant writes: > > I would not be surprised if the "fix" is actually causing the problem, > > I have not had time yet to think of a real fix. > > No, same issue with or without your "fix". Is there some more > information that would be interesting to provide in order to work out > what the relevant differences between our environments is? You could describe what you are doing step by step, but start from something that I can also reproduce: emacs -Q M-x server-start RET etc