From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: minibuffer-exit when emacsclient executes Lisp code Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:01:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20070516140157.55B3B78EF@chatsubo.ninsei.hu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179324134 22641 80.91.229.12 (16 May 2007 14:02:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 16 16:02:12 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HoK4y-0003gW-7G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 16:02:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HoKCx-0006A8-AV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 10:10:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HoKCt-00069W-Bi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 10:10:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HoKCp-00065q-Bs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 10:10:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HoKCp-00065d-9V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 10:10:19 -0400 Original-Received: from ninsei.hu ([212.92.23.158]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HoK4p-0002yZ-7g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 10:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from COM (line-122-13.gprs.westel900.net [212.51.122.13]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by chatsubo.ninsei.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B3B78EF; Wed, 16 May 2007 16:01:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: VersaMail(c) 1998-2004 3.1E, palmOne, Inc. X-Sender: karoly@lorentey.hu X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71166 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero wrote: > Are you proposing throwing the trunk version and just replacing it with the multi-tty one? No, not at all. I mean that if there is indeed a consensus that multi-tt= y will be merged soon, then perhaps emacsclient improvements should conce= ntrate on the version on the branch. The two versions are much different= and conflicts are sometimes hard to resolve correctly, leading to lost f= ixes and new regressions. If we're not yet sure multi-tty is acceptable, then please ignore my sugg= estion. This is unclear to me. --=20 K=E1roly