unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
To: cs-usenet@arcor.de
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/'
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:17:32 -0500 (CDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704262317.l3QNHWYn005964@jane.dms.auburn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0r5gv$hnt$1@sea.gmane.org> (message from Christian Schlauer on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:29:08 +0200)

Christian Schlauer wrote:

   Luc, I only wanted `/' to be treated equal as `*', not less than `*'
   as it is at the moment, but not necessarily more ;-)

Yes, but given left-associativity, the _result_ of giving them equal
precedence is actually to give, in an expression containing only `*' and
`/', `/' higher precedence, is it not?  The important consequence of
that is that in a product of rational numbers devoid of parentheses,
the rational numbers get actually recognized and treated as rational
numbers, in as far as the result is concerned, regardless of how the
actual algorithm achieves this (precedence or left-associativity).

Sincerely,

Luc.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-26 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-14 11:57 Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/' Christian Schlauer
2007-04-14 15:09 ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-15 19:21   ` Chong Yidong
2007-04-15 20:05     ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-17 12:47       ` Randal L. Schwartz
2007-04-17 18:03         ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-18  8:44           ` Kim F. Storm
2007-04-18 19:27             ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-18 20:02               ` Davis Herring
2007-04-18 20:16                 ` David Kastrup
2007-04-18 21:43                   ` Davis Herring
2007-04-19 16:10                 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-20 11:13                   ` Randal L. Schwartz
2007-04-20 13:40                     ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-20 14:07                       ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-22  1:31                         ` Miles Bader
2007-04-22 10:19                           ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-22 10:23                         ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-22 19:47                           ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-23 10:46                           ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-23 13:03                             ` Kim F. Storm
2007-04-23 15:54                               ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-25 19:56                                 ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-25 20:54                                   ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-26  3:35                                     ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-26  4:06                                       ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-26 14:11                                         ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-26 21:07                                           ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-26 15:07                                         ` Davis Herring
2007-04-26 16:01                                           ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-26 18:32                                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2007-04-26 21:29                                               ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-26 23:17                                                 ` Luc Teirlinck [this message]
2007-04-26 21:07                                     ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-27  1:27                                       ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-26 17:47                                   ` Davis Herring
2007-06-20 15:23                         ` Jay Belanger
2007-06-20 16:02                           ` Kim F. Storm
2007-06-20 17:13                             ` Jay Belanger
2007-06-20 17:29                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2007-06-20 17:54                               ` Jay Belanger
2007-06-20 19:14                                 ` Kim F. Storm
2007-06-20 19:28                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2007-06-20 20:18                                   ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-17 18:54         ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-18 21:55           ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-19  2:58             ` Daniel Brockman
2007-04-22 10:27               ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-26 16:00                 ` Daniel Brockman
2007-04-19 15:16           ` Drew Adams
2007-04-19 17:05             ` David Kastrup
2007-04-19 17:18               ` Drew Adams
2007-04-19 17:33                 ` David Kastrup
2007-04-16 15:38     ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-17 12:47 ` Randal L. Schwartz
2007-04-18 21:29   ` Christian Schlauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200704262317.l3QNHWYn005964@jane.dms.auburn.edu \
    --to=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
    --cc=cs-usenet@arcor.de \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).