From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Masatake YAMATO Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Incompatibility of CC mode Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:17:48 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20070404.231748.97433582.jet@gyve.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175696309 29958 80.91.229.12 (4 Apr 2007 14:18:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-cc-mode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 04 16:18:25 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HZ6Jb-0005TS-Ay for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:18:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZ6Mr-00021E-GH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:21:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HZ6Mn-00020V-JU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:21:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HZ6Mk-0001zu-10 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:21:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZ6Mj-0001zr-Qn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:21:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HZ6JR-0000jn-Aw; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:18:13 -0400 Original-Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l34EI4aj032630; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:18:06 -0400 Original-Received: from pobox.tokyo.redhat.com (pobox.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.33.225]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l34EI1fo023006; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (gps06.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.32.89]) by pobox.tokyo.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l34EHuKj021024; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 23:17:59 +0900 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 22.0.51 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69057 Archived-At: > Is there any good reason for this incompatibility? > If not, let's get rid of it. > > ------- Start of forwarded message ------- > X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY > autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 > DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; > h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject:date:x-mailer; > b=dTIuFhXeJa1XzScGibBwsvdZozFDIredsI5PPbrUpWmgu46kECkDaB39BkotrBhmcTA1bfRnZsfRJRW43M0hcxmZsOK961kXDmqGSofe63dYoQ60HNZ9Ps43xDen9/w/blSp7/yvJSIP9APBajtKPsf9e9WypGhd4pqBpiNBRD8= > Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed > To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > From: Paul Curry > Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:46:32 -0500 > Subject: c-subword-mode - inconsistent behavior > > The functions c-capitalize-subword, c-downcase-subword, c-upcase-subword > claim to behave like their normal emacs counterparts, but all three > functions move the point when given a negative argument. Furthermore, > c-capitalize-subword doesn't even work with a negative argument on my > machine. I changed the functions to better mimic the behavior of > capitalize/downcase/upcase/-word: they no longer move point with a > negative > argument. It seems that Paul's argument is correct. I will review Paul's version of code. Masatake YAMATO