From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "djh" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs snapshot tarball test build Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:54:03 +0900 Message-ID: <20070329105403.3876@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> References: <20070322151036.3000@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> <20070328163249.4004@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175133263 25420 80.91.229.12 (29 Mar 2007 01:54:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: djh , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 29 03:54:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HWjqA-0003Fy-Kq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 03:54:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWjsg-0007KY-To for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:56:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWjsd-0007K9-Rx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:56:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWjsb-0007JY-6A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:56:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWjsb-0007JU-0v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:56:45 -0500 Original-Received: from ns-2.to-be.co.jp ([219.127.155.130]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HWjq3-0000go-8d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 75546 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2007 10:54:04 +0900 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO imss-3.it.to-be.co.jp) (10.128.1.23) by ns-2.to-be.co.jp with SMTP; 29 Mar 2007 10:54:04 +0900 Original-Received: (qmail 21625 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2007 10:54:04 +0900 Original-Received: from localhost (HELO imss-3.it.to-be.co.jp) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Mar 2007 10:54:04 +0900 Original-Received: (qmail 21620 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2007 10:54:04 +0900 Original-Received: (qmail 21588 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2007 10:54:03 +0900 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp) (10.137.5.188) by imss-3.it.to-be.co.jp with SMTP; 29 Mar 2007 10:54:03 +0900 In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:45:20 +0200 X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3; GNU Mailutils 1.1.90; GNU Emacs 22.0.93 X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68732 Archived-At: The cvs build with 4.1.20070312 did not crash when loading blessmail, and it hasn't yet crashed when using skk input method which gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125) did frequently. > > > > GCC 4.1.3 (actually gcc-core-4.1-20070312.tar.bz2 and friends) does provide for a > > robust build from cvs though (or did on March 13th anyway.) > > How can you call it ``robust'' when it crashes while loading > blessmail? So my question is why does it build cvs emacs well and not the bz2'd version. To be accurate I should get a tarball the exact same date as the cvs version. Darel Henman