From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "djh" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs snapshot tarball test build Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:32:49 +0900 Message-ID: <20070328163249.4004@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> References: <20070322151036.3000@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175067195 25073 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2007 07:33:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: djh , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 28 09:33:08 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HWSea-00061X-4g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:33:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWSh0-0006SK-Lm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 02:35:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWSgx-0006S2-Pd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 03:35:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWSgw-0006Rd-GV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 03:35:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWSgw-0006Ra-BH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 02:35:34 -0500 Original-Received: from ns-2.to-be.co.jp ([219.127.155.130]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HWSeT-00036D-1a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 03:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 25249 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2007 16:32:50 +0900 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO imss-3.it.to-be.co.jp) (10.128.1.23) by ns-2.to-be.co.jp with SMTP; 28 Mar 2007 16:32:50 +0900 Original-Received: (qmail 1073 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2007 16:32:50 +0900 Original-Received: from localhost (HELO imss-3.it.to-be.co.jp) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Mar 2007 16:32:50 +0900 Original-Received: (qmail 1068 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2007 16:32:50 +0900 Original-Received: (qmail 1036 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2007 16:32:50 +0900 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp) (10.137.5.188) by imss-3.it.to-be.co.jp with SMTP; 28 Mar 2007 16:32:50 +0900 In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:43:07 +0200 X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3; GNU Mailutils 1.1.90; GNU Emacs 22.0.93 X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68700 Archived-At: > > The only problem is shown below (and maybe it is not a real problem). > > -------- > > ../src/emacs -batch --no-site-file --multibyte -l /usr/src/emacs-tmp/emacs-22.0.95/lib-src/../lisp/mail/blessmail.el > > Fatal error (6)make[1]: *** [blessmail] Aborted (core dumped) > > To me, this looks as an evidence that the Emacs binary you built is > unreliable. So I think we should not yet add GCC 4.1.3 to the the 3 > safe versions of Cygwin GCC mentioned in PROBLEMS. GCC 4.1.3 (actually gcc-core-4.1-20070312.tar.bz2 and friends) does provide for a robust build from cvs though (or did on March 13th anyway.) Darel