From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jashy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: apply-partially Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20063305.post@talk.nabble.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224506271 29695 80.91.229.12 (20 Oct 2008 12:37:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:37:51 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 20 14:38:46 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Krn2j-000329-QW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:11:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52623 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Krn1e-0002l5-Ao for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:09:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Krn1X-0002l0-2b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:09:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Krn1V-0002ko-7Z for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:09:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35435 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Krn1U-0002kl-Sc for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:09:44 -0400 Original-Received: from kuber.nabble.com ([216.139.236.158]:48758) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Krn1U-0005Y0-Hb for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:09:44 -0400 Original-Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Krn1R-0007yc-L8 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:09:41 -0700 In-Reply-To: X-Nabble-From: nanjunjie@gmail.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104658 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> From: Stefan Monnier >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:04:58 -0400 >> >> > I think this function should be moved to subr.el. It's too >> > general-purpose to be kept on minibuffer.el. >> >> Sure. > > Done. > A possible bug may be introduced. To reproduce: M-x switch-to-buffer Error Message: Symbol's function definition is void: args1 A possible reason may be `lexical-let' usage in `apply-partially'. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/apply-partially-tp20056439p20063305.html Sent from the Emacs - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.