From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steve Kargl Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.fortran,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs and GFortran Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:32:19 -0800 Message-ID: <20061103033219.GA50948@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20061101180354.GA62686@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20061101203931.E775C4401A@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <20061101213056.GA63890@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20061101215142.51A0944013@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <20061101223548.GA72295@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20061101224912.ED10144013@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <20061101232634.GA44475@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20061101233503.ADC4C44013@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <20061102031246.GA40490@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <8764dxtfq0.fsf@furball.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162524905 924 80.91.229.2 (3 Nov 2006 03:35:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 03:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Alfred M. Szmidt" , wt@atmos.colostate.edu, fortran@gcc.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: fortran-return-15430-gcgf-fortran=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 03 04:35:02 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcgf-fortran@gmane.org Original-Received: from sourceware.org ([209.132.176.174]) by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gfppe-0007Hv-71 for gcgf-fortran@gmane.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 04:35:02 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 5729 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2006 03:34:59 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 5662 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2006 03:34:57 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Original-Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (HELO troutmask.apl.washington.edu) (128.208.78.105) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 03:34:54 +0000 Original-Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA33WJCA050963; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:32:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Original-Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kA33WJef050962; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:32:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Original-To: Chong Yidong Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8764dxtfq0.fsf@furball.mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Original-Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.gcc.fortran:15400 gmane.emacs.devel:61653 Archived-At: On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:40:39PM -0500, Chong Yidong wrote: > > With the "simple" patch > > > > === gfortran Summary === > > > > # of expected passes 12734 > > # of unexpected failures 2171 > > # of expected failures 7 > > # of unsupported tests 73 > > If your test suites rely on a non-standard error-reporting format, > bringing the format into standards-compliance will obviously break the > test suites; but the bug here doesn't lie in the standards-compliance. The two posted patches do not bring gfortran into conformance with the GNU error format. It breaks the testsuite, which might be important to ensure half-baked patches aren't wedged into gfortran. -- Steve