From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Masatake YAMATO Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: raise-frame doesn't work in Fedora Core 4 Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:50:07 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20061101.125007.59471538.jet@gyve.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162353036 4060 80.91.229.2 (1 Nov 2006 03:50:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 03:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: yamaoka@jpl.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 01 04:50:31 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gf77T-0006LN-3F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 04:50:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gf77S-0004uE-QL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:50:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gf77H-0004s8-C4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gf77F-0004ov-5H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gf77E-0004od-U9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:50:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [210.130.0.20] (helo=mo01.iij4u.or.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gf77E-0002d9-KX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:50:13 -0500 Original-Received: MO(mo01)id kA13o8KY027038; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:50:08 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from localhost (h219-110-074-001.catv01.itscom.jp [219.110.74.1]) by r-kk.iij4u.or.jp (4U-MR/r-kk) id kA13o76S025502; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:50:08 +0900 (JST) Original-To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 22.0.51 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61529 Archived-At: > Is there some documented rationale for this wm-spec thingy? > I mean, why on earth should the window-manager need more than "XRaiseWindow" > to figure out that the window should be brought on top? I couldn't find the answer for this question. Therefore I didn't submit the patch here by myself. I'm still interesting this bug. People who meet this bug, could you tell me the window manager you are using and emacs bulid-time configuration about GUI toolkit: gtk+, athena, lucid or motif. I think I don't have enough to submit new patch before releasing the new version. ( People who can read Japanese, do C-s XRaiseWindow in https://www.codeblog.org/blog/jet/200601.html Yamaoka-san, I'm sorry that I could not keep my word. ) Masatake