From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Slawomir Nowaczyk Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: calc-dispatch problem Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:20:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20060911211209.2A2D.SLAWOMIR.NOWACZYK.847@student.lu.se> References: <87lkoql2f9.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1158002475 1169 80.91.229.2 (11 Sep 2006 19:21:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 11 21:21:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMrLD-0007Yn-90 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:21:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMrLC-0000tJ-Nz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:21:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GMrL2-0000t0-Kf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:21:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GMrKz-0000sg-Ag for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:21:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMrKz-0000sd-8K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:20:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [130.235.16.11] (helo=himmelsborg.cs.lth.se) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GMrMJ-0003iz-Jn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:22:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (slawek@dain [130.235.16.76]) by himmelsborg.cs.lth.se (8.13.6/8.13.6/perf-jw-tr) with ESMTP id k8BJKpG8026997 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:20:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87lkoql2f9.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> X-Esmandil_Citation: done X-Mailer-Plugin: Popup Memopad for Becky!2 Ver.0.02 Rev.2 X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.25.02 [en] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59697 Archived-At: On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:48:42 -0500 Jay Belanger wrote: #> Repeating the keys should start calc up normally. It was also my impression -- but, as I have just noticed, neither doc string nor manual say that explicitly (they only talk about specific case of "*" key starting calc)... I think they should be changed to specifically say that repeating key bound to calc-dispatch should work even if it has been customised. #> But `calc-dispatch' followed by "`" or "M-`" normally starts #> calc-embedded-edit, and which behavior is used depends on whether or #> not the `sit-for' is interrupted or not. If the `sit-for' is #> interrupted, then a subsequent call of `this-command-keys' gets a #> longer string than if `sit-for' isn't interrupted. Thanks for the explanation. #> I don't know what good the `sit-for' is doing; calc shouldn't behave #> differently depending on how fast those keys are pressed. I agree! #> The behaviour without the `sit-for' seems the proper behaviour; #> perhaps the `sit-for' should be removed. Sounds good to me. -- Best wishes, Slawomir Nowaczyk ( slawomir.nowaczyk.847@student.lu.se ) Most common use of Brutal Sarcasm (tm) in Computer Science is: "It's a feature."