From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Masatake YAMATO Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: etags enhancement(Was: bug-cc-mode and emacs-devel) Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 23:48:10 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20060808.234810.210028101.jet@gyve.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1155048583 3170 80.91.229.2 (8 Aug 2006 14:49:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 08 16:49:42 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GASsw-0003JK-8e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:48:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GASsu-0001Tz-9T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 10:48:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GASsg-0001SX-Hq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 10:48:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GASsf-0001Ry-4m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 10:48:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GASse-0001Rs-P6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 10:48:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [66.187.233.31] (helo=mx1.redhat.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GASx6-0002un-O1; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 10:53:04 -0400 Original-Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k78EmOiF023698; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:48:24 -0400 Original-Received: from pobox.tokyo.redhat.com (pobox.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.33.225]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k78EmKoX009062; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:48:23 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (dhcp98.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.33.98]) by pobox.tokyo.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k78EmHfj014878; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:48:19 +0900 Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 22.0.51 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58179 Archived-At: > When I write a patch for cc-mode, should I send to whether > bug-cc-mode or emacs-devel? > = > Generally, I send my patches to bug-cc-mode. > = > That is generally right. But if you think we should install > a change urgently in Emacs, send it to emacs-devel. How about etags.c? If a change is not urgently, I should send my patch to = Francesco Potort=EC?