From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reverting *Locate* buffers. Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:13:58 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <200606290313.k5T3DwTj002620@jane.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200606260327.k5Q3Rfpd013691@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <853bdsmkey.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <200606280158.k5S1wJCu004606@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <17569.64920.191861.355581@localhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1151550882 27458 80.91.229.2 (29 Jun 2006 03:14:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 03:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pbreton@cs.umb.edu, tramp-devel@gnu.org, raman@users.sourceforge.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 29 05:14:37 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fvmz8-0002Ss-Hm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 05:14:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fvmz7-0002X4-97 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:14:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fvmyw-0002Wf-7U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:14:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fvmyt-0002WH-MB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:14:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fvmyt-0002WE-Hk; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:14:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FvnBM-0002FE-4h; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: from jane.dms.auburn.edu (jane.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.201]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5T3E6fV025423; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:14:07 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from jane.dms.auburn.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jane.dms.auburn.edu (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5T3E0LO002623; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:14:00 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by jane.dms.auburn.edu (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/Submit) id k5T3DwTj002620; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:13:58 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: jane.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: raman@users.sourceforge.net In-reply-to: <17569.64920.191861.355581@localhost.localdomain> (raman@users.sourceforge.net) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:56272 Archived-At: T. V. Raman wrote: While on the error message regarding tramp, I've found that tramp being around causes *a lot* of recursive expand file calls --- try running edebug on anything that calls expand-file-name to see what I mean. Basically, tramp should only fire on the "head" of the path being expanded -- at present it appears to fire for *each* path component. Just as a general question to everybody interested (not just to the person in the "To" field): Where do we stand now in this thread? Obviously, I can not implement David's suggestion as long as there is this error message (assuming it would not give other problems, even without that message, which I can not test). Do I just commit my previously sent patch, or do we have the feeling that there are bugs in Tramp which should be reported? Note that Tramp is independently maintained by tramp-devel, which I have CC-ed, rather than by emacs-devel. I believe that the people maintaining Tramp also read emacs-devel, but I am not sure that they have followed this thread. Sincerely, Luc.