From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:05:14 -0500
Message-ID: <200605191805.k4JI5EV31066@f7.net>
References: <200605190332.k4J3WmQT012228@jane.dms.auburn.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1148061957 21799 80.91.229.2 (19 May 2006 18:05:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 18:05:57 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 19 20:05:54 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fh9M6-0008Np-VD
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 20:05:43 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fh9M6-0000NP-CX
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 14:05:42 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fh9Lu-0000L9-CX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 14:05:30 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fh9Lt-0000KY-9X
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 14:05:29 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fh9Lt-0000KV-5v
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 14:05:29 -0400
Original-Received: from [64.34.169.74] (helo=f7.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1Fh9P2-00080d-LW; Fri, 19 May 2006 14:08:44 -0400
X-Envelope-From: karl@freefriends.org
X-Envelope-To: eliz@gnu.org
Original-Received: (from karl@localhost)
	by f7.net (8.11.7-20030920/8.11.7) id k4JI5EV31066;
	Fri, 19 May 2006 13:05:14 -0500
Original-To: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu
In-Reply-To: <200605190332.k4J3WmQT012228@jane.dms.auburn.edu>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54827
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/54827>

    Again, we could try to be more perfect here for plain text and maybe
    docbook by making them go with Tex.  Worth the trouble?

Not in my opinion.  Personally, I sometimes write "see next section"
even in Info -- after all, "n" is a perfectly natural Info operation.