From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Anton Zinoviev Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH]: improving the MIK encoding in GNU emacs Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:17:02 +0300 Message-ID: <20060518081702.GA29314@debian.inet> References: <1147129862.3962.20.camel@Stamat.Minka.Localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147940292 1804 80.91.229.2 (18 May 2006 08:18:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 08:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, Alexander Shopov , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 18 10:18:05 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fgdhq-0005Bp-UO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 10:18:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fgdhq-0000G4-6A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 04:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fgdhb-0000DX-90 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 04:17:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fgdha-0000CW-5j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 04:17:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FgdhZ-0000CQ-U0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 04:17:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.96.224.22] (helo=lml.bas.bg) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fgdka-0006nf-FZ; Thu, 18 May 2006 04:20:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [85.187.46.34] (helo=debian) by lml.bas.bg with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1FgeUD-0004ml-00; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:08:01 +0300 Original-Received: from anton by debian with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Fgdgs-0007eG-FO; Thu, 18 May 2006 11:17:02 +0300 Original-To: Kenichi Handa Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54694 Archived-At: I'm sorry fo the delayed report - I was on vacation. On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 09:51:22AM +0900, Kenichi Handa wrote: > > > I believe Anton would agree with the new definition of MIK as it was him > > that revealed the sources that led to the redefinition of MIK. > > Thank you. I'll commit it if Anton doesn't oppose it. Please go ahead. The problem with MIK and the other DOS "codepages" is that some of the codes in the codepages correspond to several Unicode symbols. The choice of Microsoft for these symbols is not the best but it is better to stick with it in order have everywhere only one definition of MIK. > By the way, don't we have to update the URL shown in the > comment? > > ;; Suggested by Anton Zinoviev : Bulgarian DOS > ;; codepage. Table at > ;; . Yes this no longer will be true. You can refer to the following "source": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIK_Code_page Anton Zinoviev