From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problem report #13 FALSE Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:46:05 -0700 Message-ID: <200605110246.k4B2k5kv011189@amrm2.ics.uci.edu> References: <200604111549.k3BFnQ2N015126@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147315587 852 80.91.229.2 (11 May 2006 02:46:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 02:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 11 04:46:25 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe1C5-00026v-CW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:46:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe1C4-0006a7-UO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:46:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe1Bp-0006Wv-Dy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:46:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe1Bo-0006Vr-Oz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:46:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe1Bo-0006Vc-Ft for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:46:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [128.195.11.178] (helo=amrm2.ics.uci.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Fe1DE-0004t0-5Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:47:36 -0400 Original-Received: from amrm2.ics.uci.edu (amrm2.ics.uci.edu [127.0.0.1]) by amrm2.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4B2k5tY011190; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:46:05 -0700 Original-Received: (from dann@localhost) by amrm2.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4B2k5kv011189; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:46:05 -0700 Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Thu, 11 May 2006 11:19:00 +0900") Original-Lines: 15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54221 Archived-At: Kenichi Handa writes: > > Event var_compare_op: Added "(coding)->cmp_data" due to comparison "(coding)->cmp_data == 0" > > Also see events: [var_deref_model] > > At conditional (1): "(coding)->cmp_data == 0" taking true path > > > 6435 if (coding->type != coding_type_ccl > > 6436 && (! coding->cmp_data || coding->cmp_data->used == 0)) > > 6437 { > > Does the checker require it to be writen as below? > > > 6436 && (coding->cmp_data ? coding->cmp_data->used == 0 : 1)) I don't know...